來源：知社學(xué)術(shù)圈（微信號(hào)：zhishexueshuquan）

本文已獲得原創(chuàng)授權(quán)

前幾天發(fā)了小編論文被拒的文案，發(fā)現(xiàn)大家都很有共鳴。于是又讓小編想起兩三年前有次論文被拒，寫的退稿理由是“請(qǐng)把一作改為二作”，身為一作的小編微微一笑，“你猜我改不改？”

想來大家一定也遇到過不少神奇的退稿理由，就做了一個(gè)小小的盤點(diǎn)，如有雷同，都是緣分。

“

1. I was really looking forward to reading this manu, however this enthusiasm soon waned.

——本來興高采烈，你的論文像是一盆冰水淋頭潑下。

”

“

2. While this study represents a substantial amount of work, it is not all that clear why the work was done.

——雖然論文里顯示你做了很多很多工作，可這不是一個(gè)工作日記。

”

“

3. I wish I could explain what is the purpose of the manu.

——我的智商還不足以理解你論文的深意。

”

“

4. Authors wanted to make title catchy but actually finished trivial title, a la ‘Daily mail’

——想取個(gè)好標(biāo)題是對(duì)的，但是請(qǐng)先多讀點(diǎn)書。

”

“

5. However I deplore the fact that this paper has been created at all.

——這個(gè)論文就不該被寫出來。

”

“

6. So many electrons worked so very very hard on this paper.

——整個(gè)研究工作只有電子們很努力。

”

“

7. You are trying to do too much and end up accomplishing too little. It is a collection of good ideas that do not add up to or advance to any meaningful conclusion.

——你想做的太多了但實(shí)際做的卻很少�？茖W(xué)不是空想家的世界。

”

“

8. The discussion is inappropriate and the new content is generally poorly written。

——一派胡言毫無新意氣死老夫。

”

“

9. The team has generated the kind of gaudy, brobdignagian dataset that makes it such a curious and exciting time.

——癩蛤蟆穿上花衣服還是癩蛤蟆。

”

“

10. It seems that the author is simply engaged in proprietary phrase coining – advancing a new term for a well-researched phenomenon.

——看來，作者是專有短語創(chuàng)造工作者 - 為一些深刻的現(xiàn)象提出新的術(shù)語。

”

“

11. Moreover, it is unclear whether the effect is sufficiently important to warrant replication.

——我也不知道文章的結(jié)論有沒有意義，那就先拒了你。

”

“

12. It is worth saying that I am not convinced that you contribute to the evidence base in this paper.

——我才不信你做過這些工作呢，哼

”

“

13. That’s not how science is done.

——你研究的可能是玄學(xué)。

”

“

14. The authors conclusions not only contradict their own data but also the laws of thermodynamics.

——旁友，聽說過永動(dòng)機(jī)嗎？

”

“

15. I really don’t like to be harsh in my reviews, but…

——“可以說臟話嗎？”

——“不行。”

——“那沒事了。”

”

“

16. While I think there is good reason to have performed this work, it does make for unexciting reading.

——語文是體育老師教的？

”

“

17. Line 156-160; this is the only correct, sensible and interesting finding of the paper.

——全篇幾萬字只有四行不是瞎扯蛋。

”

“

18. It feels a little bit like someone wanting to run a series of statistics.

——你企圖成為一臺(tái)計(jì)算機(jī)嗎？

”

“

19. Are the “10 random reps" chosen at random?

——你這十個(gè)隨機(jī)選取對(duì)象是抓鬮的嗎？

”

“

20. The authors need to add a level of puzzlement to their interpretations.

——你知道為什么《蒙娜麗莎》賣的比《沉睡的維納斯》貴嗎？

”

“

21. One wonders whether the analysis was an exercise in using a cannon to open an unlocked door.

——你的分析過程簡直是用一門大炮轟開一扇沒鎖的門。

”

“

22. This work is only a maths game.

——只有我七歲的兒子有資格讓我跟他玩數(shù)學(xué)游戲。

”

“

23. Overall, I think this manu is a waste of time.

——寫這個(gè)論文不如去幫媽媽多做點(diǎn)家務(wù)。

”

“

24. Moreover, it is very difficult to see the actual contribution this manu will have.

——What’s the shit???