LIU Chang qing,CHEN Wan,ZENG Yi fang,et al.Hydrogen Production Capacity of Semi continuous Fermentation of SARD and CSTR Bio hydrogen Production Reactor[J].China Water & Wastewater,2018,34(21):7-11.
SARD與CSTR反應(yīng)器半連續(xù)發(fā)酵產(chǎn)氫能力對(duì)比
- Title:
- Hydrogen Production Capacity of Semi continuous Fermentation of SARD and CSTR Bio hydrogen Production Reactor
- 文章編號(hào):
- 1000-4602(2018)21-0007-06
- 關(guān)鍵詞:
- 污泥; 餐廚垃圾; 生物制氫; SARD反應(yīng)器; CSTR反應(yīng)器
- Keywords:
- sludge; food waste; bio-hydrogen production; semi-continuous anaerobic rotary drum; continuous stirred tank reactor
- 分類號(hào):
- TU992
- 文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)志碼:
- A
- 摘要:
- 污泥與餐廚垃圾含有豐富有機(jī)質(zhì)，將其進(jìn)行生物產(chǎn)氫具有處理固體廢棄物和開發(fā)氫能的雙重意義。生物反應(yīng)器的高效啟動(dòng)是該技術(shù)的關(guān)鍵因素。采用SARD和CSTR反應(yīng)器并輔以血清瓶，以污泥和餐廚垃圾作為反應(yīng)基質(zhì)，考察不同運(yùn)行時(shí)間、投配比(回流比)下的氫氣濃度及比產(chǎn)氫速率，以確定各反應(yīng)器的最佳運(yùn)行條件并篩選出較優(yōu)的反應(yīng)器。結(jié)果表明，SARD和CSTR在10~15 h內(nèi)先后達(dá)到了50.34%和53.43%的氫氣濃度最大值，最大比產(chǎn)氫速率分別為18.09、14.98 mL/（gDS·h）。投配比為50%、進(jìn)料時(shí)間間隔為8 h是較理想的進(jìn)料方式。SARD與CSTR反應(yīng)器半連續(xù)運(yùn)行的比產(chǎn)氫速率在穩(wěn)定階段分別維持在4.40、2.37 mL/（gDS·h）左右。相比較而言，SARD的運(yùn)行效果優(yōu)于CSTR，且半連續(xù)運(yùn)行比批式運(yùn)行的效果更佳。
- Abstract:
- Sludge and food wastes are rich in organic matter, and can be used as the substrate of biohydrogen production, which has a double significance for solid waste treatment and development of hydrogen energy. How to start the reactor efficiently is the key factors. SARD (semicontinuous anaerobic rotary drum) and CSTR(continuous stirred tank reactor) were used as hydrogen production reactor to investigate the influence of operation time and reflux ratio by adding sludge and food wastes, and analyzing hydrogen concentration and specific hydrogen yield. The results indicated that the hydrogen concentration reached the maximum value of 50.34% and 53.43% after 10-15 h in SARD and CSTR, respectively; the maximum specific hydrogen yield was 18.09 mL/(gDS·h) and 14.98 mL/(gDS·h) respectively. The better feeding mode was 50% adding ratio and interval 8 h. The specific hydrogen yields of SARD and CSTR were stable at 4.40 mL/(gDS·h）and 2.37 mL/(gDS·h) respectively. In comparison, semicontinuous operation was better than batch one, and SARD was better than CSTR.
參考文獻(xiàn)/References:
［1］盧文玉,劉銘輝,陳宇,等. 厭氧發(fā)酵法生物制氫的研究現(xiàn)狀和發(fā)展前景［J］. 中國生物工程雜志,2006,26(7):99-104. Lu Wenyu,Liu Minghui,Chen Yu,et al. Research process of 〖JP〗anaerobic fermentative hydrogen production and its development future［J］. China Biotechnology,2006,26(7):99-104(in Chinese).
［2］任南琪,李永峰,李建政,等. 中國發(fā)酵法生物制氫技術(shù)研究進(jìn)展［J］. 化工學(xué)報(bào),2004,55(S1):7-14. Ren Nanqi,Li Yongfeng,Li Jianzheng,et al. Progress of fermentative biohydrogen production process in China［J］. Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering,2004,55(S1):7-14(in Chinese).
［3］Liu X Y,Wang L,Li Y F,et al. The succession of microbial community in CSTR hydrogen production system［J］. Adv Mater Res,2010,113/116:1297-1301.
［4］Dinamarca C,Bakke R. Process parameters affecting the sustainability of fermentative hydrogen production:Ashortreview［J］. International Journal of Energy Environment & Economics,2011,2(6):1067-1078.
［5］Han S K,Kim S H,Shin H S. UASB treatment of wastewater with VFA and alcohol generated during hydrogen fermentation of food waste［J］. Process Biochem,2005,40(8):2897-2905.
［6］Wang X,Ding J,Ren N Q,et al. CFD simulation of an expanded granular sludge bed (EGSB) reactor for biohydrogen production［J］. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,2009,34(24):9686-9695.
［7］郭強(qiáng). 餐廚垃圾滾筒式發(fā)酵制氫反應(yīng)器設(shè)計(jì)及運(yùn)行參數(shù)調(diào)控［D］. 上海:同濟(jì)大學(xué),2007. Guo Qiang. Design and Operation Parameters Regulation of Hydrogen Production of Food Wastes in SARD［D］. Shanghai:Tongji University,2007(in Chinese).
［8］Zhang Z P,Show K Y,Tay J H,et al. Effect of hydraulic retention time on biohydrogen production and anaerobic microbial community［J］. Process Biochem,2006,41
相似文獻(xiàn)/References:
[1]顏瑩瑩,梁遠(yuǎn),沙雪華,等.新冠肺炎疫情下關(guān)于減少污泥中病原體的思考[J].中國給水排水,2020,36(6):22.
[2]郭波,田瑜,范晨,等.綠色納米鐵/H2O2聯(lián)用兩性脫水劑調(diào)理污泥研究[J].中國給水排水,2020,36(13):62.
GUO Bo,TIAN Yu,FAN Chen,et al. Sludge Conditioning by Green Iron Nanoparticles/H2O2 Combined with Amphoteric Dewatering Agent [J].China Water & Wastewater,2020,36(21):62.
[3]許勁,范準(zhǔn),呂秋穎,等.山地城市污泥水熱炭化產(chǎn)物特性研究[J].中國給水排水,2020,36(21):21.
XU Jin,FAN Zhun,L Qiu-ying,et al.Characteristics of Hydrothermal Carbonization Products of Municipal Sludge in Mountainous Cities[J].China Water & Wastewater,2020,36(21):21.
[4]李金河,張波濤,劉寶玉,等.污泥中溫厭氧消化最佳溫度及改善機(jī)理分析[J].中國給水排水,2021,37(3):9.
LI Jin-he,ZHANG Bo-tao,LIU Bao-yu,et al.Optimal Reaction Temperature in Mesophilic Anaerobic Digestion of Waste Activated Sludge and Its Promotion Mechanism[J].China Water & Wastewater,2021,37(21):9.
[5]王麗花,呂國鈞,王飛,等.污泥干化焚燒系統(tǒng)的節(jié)能降耗研究[J].中國給水排水,2021,37(4):29.
WANG Li-hua,Lü Guo-jun,WANG Fei,et al.Research on Energy Saving and Consumption Reduction of Sludge Drying and Incineration System[J].China Water & Wastewater,2021,37(21):29.
[6]紀(jì)莎莎,黃瑾.污泥焚燒工程中的磷形態(tài)分布與磷遷移研究[J].中國給水排水,2021,37(5):26.
JI Sha-sha,HUANG Jin.Phosphorus Forms Distribution and Migration in Sludge Incineration Project[J].China Water & Wastewater,2021,37(21):26.
[7]馬彩霞,劉蕾,李碧清,等.強(qiáng)化化學(xué)淋濾對(duì)污泥重金屬溶出及磷釋放的影響[J].中國給水排水,2021,37(5):66.
MA Cai-xia,LIU Lei,LI Bi-qing,et al.Effect of Enhanced Chemical Leaching on Heavy Metal Dissolution and Phosphorus Release from Sludge[J].China Water & Wastewater,2021,37(21):66.
[8]夏一帆,王冰潔,涂凌波,等.DMBR短程硝化反硝化處理餐廚垃圾厭氧沼液[J].中國給水排水,2021,37(7):27.
XIA Yi-fan,WANG Bing-jie,TU Ling-bo,et al.Treatment of Food Waste Digestate by DMBR with Partial Nitrification and Denitrification[J].China Water & Wastewater,2021,37(21):27.
[9]王華金.餐廚垃圾全物料濕式厭氧消化產(chǎn)沼技術(shù)的工程應(yīng)用[J].中國給水排水,2021,37(8):95.
WANG Hua-jin.Engineering Application of Wet Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production Technology for Full-scale Food Waste[J].China Water & Wastewater,2021,37(21):95.
[10]李義爍,梁遠(yuǎn),顏瑩瑩,等.餐廚垃圾/市政污泥/城市糞便聯(lián)合厭氧消化沼液處理設(shè)計(jì)[J].中國給水排水,2021,37(14):56.
LI Yi-shuo,LIANG Yuan,YAN Ying-ying,et al.Design of Treatment Process of Biogas Slurry from Anaerobic Co-digestion of Kitchen Waste/Municipal Sludge/Urban Excrement[J].China Water & Wastewater,2021,37(21):56.
備注/Memo
基金項(xiàng)目：福建省科技廳重大專項(xiàng)(2015YZ0001-1)；福建省科技廳重點(diǎn)項(xiàng)目(2018Y0022)
通信作者：趙由才E-mail:zhaoyoucai@#edu.cn
作者簡介： 劉常青（1970- ），女，福建閩清人，博士，副教授，主要從事固體廢物處理與資源化研究。
E-mail:mylcq@126.com
收稿日期：2018-03-23
